In his allocution to the Assisi Liturgical Congress in 1956, Pope Pius XII said, among other things, “The liturgical movement is thus shown forth as a sign of the providential dispositions of God for the present time, of the movement of the Holy Ghost in the Church, to draw men more closely to the mysteries of the faith and the riches of grace which flow from the active participation of the faithful in the liturgical life.”
But how we should evaluate the liturgical movement today? Tomorrow, beginning at 9pm Eastern time, musician and author Aurelio Porfiri will host a discussion of this topic with Fr Thomas Kocik, author of “Singing His Song: A Short Introduction to the Liturgical Movement”, Fr Paul Gunter OSB, professor at the Pontifical Liturgical Institute of Rome, and Chris Carstens, editor of Adoremus. The program will be streamed on various social media channels, including the YouTube channel RITORNO A ITACA (https://www.youtube.com/c/RitornoaItaca), Maestro Porfiri’s Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/MaestroAurelioPorfiri/) and Twitter account (https://twitter.com/AurelioPorfiri).Thursday, October 14, 2021
Sunday, August 08, 2021
Live Discussion Tomorrow on TC with Card. Zen and Bish. Schneider, Hosted by Aurelio Porfiri
Gregory DiPippoTomorrow, Dr Aurelio Porfiri, who has been very active in promoting the cause of good sacred music in the liturgy, will hold a discussion on the future of the traditional Latin Mass with Cardinal Joseph Zen, Bishop Athanasius Schneider, James Bogle, Felipe Alanís Suárez, Robert Moynihan and John C. Rao. The program will be live streamed on his You Tube channel RITORNO A ITACA, on his Facebook, AURELIO PORFIRI and on his TWITTER account. The program will begin at 3pm Italian time, which 9am on the East coast of the United States.
Posted Sunday, August 08, 2021
Labels: Aurelio Porfiri, Bishop Schneider, Cardinal Zen, Traditionis Custodes
Tuesday, March 03, 2020
A New Book by Aurelio Porfiri, Reviewed by Giuseppe Pellegrino
Gregory DiPippoForever I Will Sing: A Short History of Catholic Sacred Music by Aurelio Porfiri (Chorabooks, Hong Kong, 2020). Foreword by Cardinal Raymond Burke. Reviewed by Giuseppe Pellegrino.
The Foreword by Cardinal Raymond Burke is in itself a beautiful reflection. He turns immediately to Saint Pius X’s 1903 Motu Proprio, Tra le sollecitudini, in which the sainted pontiff observes that “there certainly is a constant tendency in sacred music to neglect the right principles of an art used in the service of the liturgy.” It is one of the duties of the Roman Pontiff, as well as the Church’s Magisterium, to cultivate music that is worthy of the sacred mysteries: true art at the service of the liturgical action of Christ and his Church. Pius X identifies three qualities which ought to distinguish sacred music: holiness, beauty, and universality. His Eminence expresses hope that this book will help Catholics to be aware of the Church’s rich tradition of sacred music so as to cultivate its preservation and execution in the context of the sacred liturgy, for the edification and sanctification of the faithful.
Porfiri for his part notes in his introductory remarks that he simply wants to help people deepen their knowledge of the Church’s rich musical history so that they can continue to know and love Christ through knowing the Tradition. After mentioning how difficult it was to decide what to include in such a short one-volume comprehensive history, he writes: “It is a history that is fascinating because of some failures, struggles, and the effort to be always dignified, even if the mistakes and abuses have at times been numerous. Today we live in a difficult time for sacred music, so I think it is urgent that we look back and evaluate once again the teachings of the Fathers, Masters, Saints and others. In this way we will be able to look once more at the main outcome of music in the liturgy and of the liturgy itself: the glory of God and the sanctification of the faithful.”
His chronological journey begins with an examination of the Jewish origins of Christian chant and cantillation, the sung proclamation of sacred texts that Jesus himself likely used when proclaiming the reading in the synagogue as the Gospels tell us. He addresses the question of what exactly Saint Paul was referring to when he encouraged the Colossians to teach each other with “psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs” (Col 3:16). He spends time developing a rich presentation of the patristic liturgical tradition, from Justin Martyr to Ignatius of Antioch to Clement of Alexandria. A very interesting passage from Tertullian describes the singing and liturgical practice at Carthage about the year 200. Athanasius is quoted extensively about the importance of music cultivating a truly spiritual, and not just aesthetic, experience. Basil the Great describes the custom of vigils and the singing of psalms practiced by the clergy of the Eastern Church around 370. Gregory of Nazianzus reminds the reader of the powerful witness made by the liturgical music of the Church of Constantinople at the center of imperial power:
For he (the emperor Valens) entered the Church attended by the whole of his train; it was the festival of the Epiphany, and the Church was crowded, and, by taking his place among the people, he made a profession of unity. The occurrence is not to be lightly passed over. Upon his entrance he was struck by the thundering roll of the Psalms, by the sea of heads of the congregation, and by the angelic rather than human order which pervaded the sanctuary and its precincts (In Laudem Basilii Magni).Ephrem the Syrian, Prudentius, Sedulius, and others all receive attention, as well as Niceta of Remesiana, whom tradition says is the author of the Te Deum, John Cassian, and of course Gregory the Great, who describes in detail how the Alleluia, Kyrie Eleison, and Pater Noster were variously incorporated into the Roman Liturgy prior to his pontificate, and for what reason.
Moving into the medieval period, Porfiri examines the Greek influence on the Church of Rome, the codification of chant in various liturgical books, the development of neumes and musical notation, and the influence exerted by individuals like Charlemagne on the continued development of the Roman Rite. The book delves into a fascinating debate by modern scholars about how accurately modern Gregorian chant truly re-presents the sound of medieval chant. Because chants were learned in the context of a living oral liturgical tradition, musical liturgical texts can only give an approximate guide to what a chanted antiphon or sequence may have sounded like over one thousand years ago. In the words of Giacomo Baroffio:
We have no faithful record of executions of a thousand or more years ago. We know nothing about the vocal emission, the scalar structure and the presence (fluid or fixed?) of macro and micro-intervals. The pronunciation of Latin poses large questions in and of itself about the performance and perception of the melodies…. We are deluded if we think that we perform Gregorian chant correctly only because in some, relatively few, cases we substitute some note in the name of an authenticity that is often only imagined.This is an intriguing scholarly discussion of a complex problem, reminding us that there is still far more that we do not know than we do know about the execution of medieval liturgical music.
Polyphony receives a great amount of attention as the book moves through the high medieval period, as well as the great liturgical school of Notre Dame de Paris, where the composer Leonin wrote the Magnus Liber Organi, a collection of two-part organums for the entire church year. The work of Josquin des Prez, Orlande de Lassus, Tomas Luis de Victoria, and of course Giovanni Pierluigi de Palestrina all receive ample consideration as Porfiri continues his tour through the Renaissance.
The book does not go in depth into how the Protestant “Reformers” changed liturgical music, and that was one aspect this reviewer hoped would be addressed more deeply. But this is understandable in such a short overview. Bach, Handel, Mozart, and Beethoven all receive their due, as well as other great composers of the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries. The seminal work of Prosper Gueranger and the monks of Solesmes in restoring and reforming Gregorian chant is addressed, leading to Saint Pius X and his magna carta for restoring good musical practice, Tra le sollecitudini.
Porfiri mentions the Second Vatican Council and the decline of liturgical music since 1965 only in passing, choosing instead to focus his account of the 20th century on some of the great liturgical composers of the 20th century, such as Domenico Bartolucci, the maestro of the Sistine Chapel Choir for over 40 years, Luciano Migliavacca, maestro at the Duomo of Milan, and Alberico Vitalini of Vatican Radio. Porfiri concludes with a reflection on the (mostly dismal) state of liturgical music at present and makes a concise presentation of his remedy for the authentic renewal of sacred music:
I am strongly convinced that a rebirth of authentic sacred music has to stem from greater attention being given to tradition. Only when people are again familiar with the great lesson coming from Gregorian chant, will they be able to conceive music that will be truly holy using good forms that are universal. The Church should invest again in the formation of musicians and treat them professionally, not just relying on volunteers who in most cases have very limited musical abilities.Forever I Will Sing would make an excellent introductory text book for a high school or undergraduate course on the history of sacred music. Aurelio Porfiri is to be commended for his desire to expose more Catholics to the deep and rich patrimony which we possess as members of Western civilization and the Church. His book teaches us and reminds us that there is still far, far more cause for hope and wonder in our Tradition, despite the present dissonance and darkness.
Forever I Will Sing is available for purchase online here. Aurelio Porfiri is the editor of Altare Dei, a new website dedicated to the role of art, music, and beauty in evangelization and the Catholic Tradition.
Our thanks to Mr Pellegrino for sharing this review with New Liturgical Movement.
Thursday, February 07, 2019
A Pair of Insightful Books on Sacred Music
Peter KwasniewskiPorfiri's publishing company, ChoraBooks, has brought out a number of interesting titles in recent years, such as David Fagerberg's Liturgy Outside Liturgy: The Liturgical Theology of Fr. Alexander Schmemann, and Singing His Song: A Short Introduction to the Liturgical Movement by NLM contributor Fr. Thomas Kocik.
Today I would like to announce the publication of two more titles: a collection of Maestro Porfiri's best writing on choral music, Less is More, and an intriguing book by Giacomo Baroffio, Re-tractationes: The Spirituality of Gregorian Chant.
Porfiri's book Less is More focuses a great deal on the philosophy of interpretation and the art of singing communicatively and movingly. He speaks with an almost Zen-like concentration on the value of simplicity, of understatement, of allowing music to speak for itself, and the origin and end of music in a divine silence. Barbs against romanticism, individualism, and idiosyncratism add zest to a text rich with literary, musical, and theological references. Of particular weight in this collection are the chapters "For a Theology of A Cappella Music" (pp. 31-41), and "Making Music in the Dragon's Land: An Italian Priest and Macau in the 1920s" (pp. 57-87), an absolute must-read for those who are interested in questions of inculturation, evangelization, and the universality of the Catholic sacred music tradition. Porfiri sums up the aim of this book as an attempt to say why we sing choral music, not just how it can be done with technical success.
Baroffio's book Re-tractationes is reminiscent of Guardini's The Spirit of the Liturgy, inasmuch as it articulates a vision of liturgy that is at once cosmic and personal, public and interior, formal and playful. "The liturgy is a mystical path," he writes (9). I will admit that I got a bit lost in the first part (pp. 2-16), but in the second part (pp. 17-30), devoted to "singing the faith," the author reconnected with me powerfully. "The song of psalmody ... reawakens the desire of Tabor: to see Jesus, to be with Him. It is the desire of Mary to remain seated at his feet, to look up, to offer a song" (18). "In the liturgy we sing because we are in love with God" (21). "The word that surfaces on our lips frees itself from its limitations and expands into song" (23) -- a saying that reminds one especially of the melismatic chants of the Gradual and the Alleluia. "Liturgical prayer teaches us to put ourselves on a wavelength independent of worldly chaos" (25). And perhaps my favorite statement: "Indifference towards sacred music is all the more blameworthy since this attitude actually hides a total lack of interest in the liturgy as such" (27).
As the book proceeds, the author focuses more and more on plainchant. "Gregorian chant has the power to sing, to divert the heart from preoccupations, because it orients itself to God in adoration and silence" (33). "It is music that infuses deep spiritual recesses with words and breaks the limits of lexical meaning by expressing with sound the ineffable vibrations that otherwise would not be able to free themselves from the human heart" (37). "The marginalization and expulsion of Gregorian chant from the liturgy have encouraged the spreading of cackles and mawkishness that, beyond their artistic inconsistency, are not able to direct hearts to God" (42). "Iconoclasm -- which sometimes prevents any polyphonic or Gregorian choral presence in the name of the active participation of the people -- is a tragic and ridiculous lie. Certain deep fibers of man's being can begin to vibrate only if prompted by certain musical pieces whose execution transcends the possibilities of the assembly" (54).
I won't quote all of the best lines in the book; the above samples well represent the insightfulness of Baroffio as he warms to his subject. My criticisms of the book are minor. The custom of always writing "G-o-d," which I have seen in Jewish authors, seems out of place here. The occasional lapse into talk of God's "fatherly and motherly" love, while capable of an orthodox interpretation, is surely distracting in our age. There are occasional moments of utter diffuseness and opacity, as well as a few random thoughts that do not seem to fit in with the context. Nevertheless, on the whole, the book gives much food for thought, and I recommend it for those who are keen to probe the spirituality of Gregorian chant.
Monday, April 02, 2018
Announcing Liturgy Outside Liturgy: The Liturgical Theology of Fr. Alexander Schmemann by David Fagerberg
Peter KwasniewskiChorabooks has just released what looks like a fascinating book, pertinent to readers of NLM.
David W. Fagerberg, Liturgy outside Liturgy. The Liturgical Theology of Fr. Alexander Schmemann.
Hong Kong: Chorabooks, 2018.
Paperback $ 24.60 ISBN 9789887851547
EBook (Kindle) $ 9.83 ISBN 9789887851509
EBook (Epub) Euro 6.99 ISBN 9789887851585
Available immediately in all the Amazon stores in Kindle and paperback format, and in more than 100 online stores in Epub format (Feltrinelli, Rizzoli, Mondadori, hoepli, Book Republic, Libreria universitaria, San Paolo store, Il fatto quotidiano, Il giardino dei libri, Google play, Ibooks store, Kobobooks, Tolino, Casa del libro, Bajalibros, Nookstore, Weltbild, El corte inglés, Barnes and Nobles, etc.)
DESCRIPTION
This is an important question that David W. Fagerberg, Theology Professor at Notre Dame University asks himself and us. And to answer this question, he is presenting the thought of Fr. Alexander Schmemann (1921-1983), who was a leading theologian in the Orthodox Church in America and one of the foremost thinkers in liturgical theology. The material is based on careful scholarship, but presented in such a way that the common reader will also benefit from the many powerful insights that can be found in it.
Schmemann made powerful statements to make readers think seriously. For example, about the world he says, “We seem to forget that in the New Testament and in the whole Christian tradition the ‘world’ is the object of two apparently contradicting attitudes: an emphatic acceptance, a yes, but also an equally emphatic rejection, a no.” And about the relationship of theology and the Church he writes, “[Theology] today constitutes within the Church a self-centered world, virtually isolated from the Church’s life. It lives in itself and by itself in tranquil academic quarters, well defended against profane intrusions and curiosities by a highly technical language. Theologians avoid discussing the trivial reality of the Church’s life, and do not even dream about influencing it in any way. In turn the Church, i.e., the bishops, priests and laity, are supremely indifferent to the writings of the theologians, even when they do not regard them with open suspicion. … Theology simply fails to reach anybody but professionals, to provoke anything but esoteric controversies in academic periodicals.”
Against the dangers of a liturgy that is auto referential, Fagerberg observes that “Liturgical reform should not, therefore, be self-serving; liturgical reform is a matter of empowering the Church’s leitourgia, which is the work of a few on behalf of the many.” He summarizes the conclusion his book in this way: “Let me conclude with a glance back over all three investigations: should liturgy matter, where is theology done, and does liturgy enter our life? In these three questions we were only following Schmemann’s own definition of the goal of liturgical theology, which is to overcome the fateful divorce between theology, liturgy, and piety. This breakup deprived liturgy of its proper understanding, theology of its living source, and piety of its living content. … The liturgical cult does not exist for itself, but for the sake of the world, for the sake of understanding and transforming the world.”
This book is not only for academic theologians, but also for all those who love the liturgy and are willing to be challenged with a fresh perspective on this fundamental topic for our Christian life.
AUTHOR
David W. Fagerberg is a theology professor at the University of Notre Dame (Indiana, USA). Fagerberg’s area of study is liturgical theology: its definition and methodology, and how the Church’s lex orandi (law of prayer) is the foundation for her lex credendi (law of belief). Lately he has been working on how liturgy, theology, and asceticism interrelate. He also has interests in sacramental theology, Eastern Orthodoxy, linguistic philosophy, scholasticism, G. K. Chesterton and C. S. Lewis. He is the author of several books, including Consecrating the World: On Mundane Liturgical Theology (Angelico Press, 2016).
Reading the sentence quoted above, "The liturgical cult does not exist for itself, but for the sake of the world, for the sake of understanding and transforming the world,” one might feel a slight misgiving. Apart from the obvious sense in which this is true, namely, that liturgy is not a club activity, like a game, could it not be dangerous to say that the cultus of God is for understanding and transforming the world? This may sound like a Marxist redirection of worship away from the divine towards the mundane and immanent? Do not the Orthodox rightly say that liturgy is doxology, the acknowledgment and praise of God in His greatness and for Himself -- which then spills over (or can and should spill over) into the rest of our lives?
But we have to understand the sense in which Fagerberg -- and Schmemann and Kavanaugh, if I construe them rightly -- understand this world-liturgy dialectic. This trio of authors has to be understood as offering a creative, redemptive response to religion's headlong rush into the arms of Marxism. When the whole world was deserting "organized religion" and "dogmas" as "irrelevant" to the world-changing processes going on, they argued that the liturgy was "the world done right." When the denominations were being suburbanized, taken away from the center of life in the city, they proposed bringing liturgy "back to the city." Against the psychologists who said religion was "abnormal," they said liturgy was the only way to be "normal." So, the world-transforming aspect should be understood as a corrective of Marxism, which thinks that the world can be understood and transformed by human action alone. Liturgy is the real revolution, if you will, and the real psycho-therapy, precisely because it is not reducible to horizontal political and economic relationships or psychological categories, but is inherently from above and ordered beyond itself.
Christ came as an epiphany in order to transform the world for the Father's glory, which is revealed in and through creation, embodied in man rescued from sin and death. As the extension of the Incarnation, the sacred liturgy participates in this mission, for the life of the world, to hasten it on its reditus to the Creator. The liturgy is therefore meant to be the axis of human culture, the pole star around which the constellation of all human endeavors circles, the vital center of civilization. It is a fleshly, sensible regime of worship proportioned, like the Incarnation, to man's bodily nature, given to us to draw our attention and devotion to God, granting us a dramatic vision of the universe gathered in worship of its Final End. This vision allows us to coordinate all our activity toward our End, thus fulfilling our role as high priests in bringing all things to God.
From what I have read over the years, it seems that Fr. Schmemann, whatever his limitations from a traditional Catholic perspective, is well positioned to help us work through these points, with a combination of mystical penetration and no-nonsense critique. I am therefore happy to see this new book by Fagerberg and look forward to digging into it.
Saturday, September 23, 2017
Interview with Dr. Kwasniewski at O Clarim: “The Mass of all the Catholic centuries”
Peter KwasniewskiThe online journal O Clarim has just published an interview about my book Noble Beauty, Transcendent Holiness that NLM readers might like to read. A couple of excerpts here:
Aurelio Porfiri: Your book uses the phrase “noble beauty” in its title. How would you describe the noble beauty of the liturgy?
Kwasniewski: There are many different kinds of beauty. There is the simple, domestic beauty we associated with well-made furniture, carpets, blankets, plates, and books. There is an austere beauty, such as one might find in the cell of a Carthusian. There is rugged beauty, such as we see in the landscapes of Iceland or Canada or Alaska. But there is a noble beauty that we associate with sovereignty, majesty, occasions of great public solemnity. The liturgy is our courtly audience with the king of heaven and earth. It should be characterized by a tremendous sense of spaciousness, elevation, dignity, and splendor. That is what I am driving at in my title.
Porfiri: What is your ideal reader? How you imagine your audience?
Kwasniewski: One reader described me as “giving old arguments new juice.” I was born well after the Second Vatican Council ended and after Paul VI had already promulgated a new Mass. All of the traditional things I love are things that almost went extinct. My friends and I had to stumble upon them and discover them anew. I see it all with fresh eyes: I have no nostalgic memories. For this reason, my writings seem to speak especially to young people who are in the same boat. This book is largely an “apologia” for the ancient liturgy and the whole world-view it embodies—which is definitely not that of modernity. My ideal reader? Someone who has an open mind to the proposal that the past generations might have had more wisdom than we do.
Porfiri: You use the term “Mass of Ages” in your subtitle. Sounds a bit sentimental, doesn’t it?
Kwasniewski: Well, I once thought of it that way, too. But something changed for me. My careful study of liturgical history led me to see that, in fact, the Roman Catholic liturgy—by which I mean all of the interconnected rites and uses found within Latin Christendom—is one and the same over all the centuries, developing slowly and organically, until you reach the dramatic break in the 1960s. The core of the Mass of St Gregory the Great was still the core of the Mass of St John XXIII. After Trent, St Pius V for all intents and purposes codified the papal rite of Rome that stretched far back in time. Subsequent popes received this rite as a given. It really is, therefore, the Mass of all the Catholic centuries. It is a Mass that grew to maturity over the ages and reflects all that is best in the Church’s devotion and theology.
Friday, June 02, 2017
Fourth Issue of Altare Dei Now Available, with New Layout and New Contributors
Peter KwasniewskiThanks to reader feedback and editorial review, Altare Dei has adopted a new format, more elegant and attractive, and easier to read. The fourth issue also features a number of new writers and some very interesting themes. The table of contents may be found below. Allow me to draw your attention in particular to Marco Tosatti on Fatima, Cavalcoli on Schillebeeckx, an article from Denis Crouan (whom we in America have not heard from in a long time), and Fr. Spataro contributing a piece with the explosive title: "The Traditional Liturgy as Field Hospital." And lots of other good stuff. This is the best issue so far.
To purchase a copy (€6.80), visit here.
Aurelio Porfiri
TOP STORY
The Mysteries of Fatima
Marco Tosatti
LITURGICAL THEOLOGY
The Eucharist According to Edward Schillebeeckx
Giovanni Cavalcoli
LITURGY
Thoughts from Benedict
David M. Friel
Why does the Church’s liturgy bore the faithful so much
Denis Crouan
The substantial Benedict
David W. Fagerberg
Traditional Liturgy as Field Hospital
Roberto Spataro
The Problem of the Sacred
Samuel Nyom
Breaking Liturgical Bad Habits
Peter A. Kwasniewski
MUSICAL INSERT
DEO GRATIAS (SATB and Organ) Colin Mawby
VIRGO CLEMENS (SATB) Valentino Miserachs
DE MARIA NUMQUAM SATIS (SATB) Aurelio Porfiri
O SALUTARIS HOSTIA (SA and Organ) Aurelio Porfiri
SACRED MUSIC
The Singing of the Ministers in the Eucharistic Celebration
Aurelio Porfiri
CATHOLIC CULTURE
“Tradition is Christ Himself”: an interview with Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke
Aurelio Porfiri
“Tangentitis” and Its Cure
Aldo Maria Valli
Pastoral Practice in the Church
Antonio Livi
Victory over Evil
Silvana De Mari
25 Years Ago, Grace Entered my Life
Massimo Viglione
EVENTS
A Conference of African Theology
Joseph Ahmad
BOOK REVIEW
"The Shroud: History and Mystery"
Zachary J. Thomas
(Issue #4 is available here.)
Tuesday, May 30, 2017
The Singing of Ministers in the Eucharistic Celebration: Guest Article by Aurelio Porfiri
Gregory DiPippoOnce again, our thanks to Maestro Aurelio Porfiri for sharing an article with NLM, this time on the importance of singing the Mass. It will shortly be available in the May issue of Altare Dei, which can be purchased at the following link: http://choralife.com/product-category/magazine/
Lingering a bit over the question of the ministers’ singing in the liturgy, we can observe the mirabile dictum of Sacrosanctum Concilium: “Liturgical worship is given a more noble form when the divine offices are celebrated solemnly in song, with the assistance of sacred ministers and the active participation of the people” (113). Now let’s try for a minute to understand this passage. It says that liturgical worship has a more noble form when the divine offices are vested with solemnity. Further, this solemnity is achieved by means of song. And further, this song comes from the sacred ministers and from the active participation of the people. Now there is much brouhaha about the fact that the people ought to participate, and there has been ample debate over what is meant by this participation. (note 1) Yet to me one thing remains clear and worthy of note: the fact that the sacred minister’s singing is just as necessary as that of the people (in their proper participatory modes, and not in the frenetic “participationism” in vogue for the last few decades). The singing of the sacred minister is given such importance that, in the paragraph dedicated to musical formation, the document affirms as follows:
“Great importance is to be attached to the teaching and practice of music in seminaries, in the novitiates and houses of study of religious of both sexes, and also in other Catholic institutions and schools. To impart this instruction, teachers are to be carefully trained and put in charge of the teaching of sacred music.
It is desirable also to found higher institutes of sacred music whenever this can be done.
Composers and singers, especially boys, must also be given a genuine liturgical training” (115).
![]() |
| Courtesy of the Fraternity of St Peter (from this post back in January) |
“Between the solemn, fuller form of liturgical celebration, in which everything that demands singing is in fact sung, and the simplest form, in which singing is not used, there can be various degrees according to the greater or lesser place allotted to singing. However, in selecting the parts which are to be sung, one should start with those that are by their nature of greater importance, and especially those which are to be sung by the priest or by the ministers, with the people replying, or those which are to be sung by the priest and people together. The other parts may be gradually added according as they are proper to the people alone or to the choir alone” (7).
It follows that the parts pertaining to the priest are to be considered the most important ones with regard to singing. A not insignificant statement! It should be read together with comes next:
“Whenever, for a liturgical service which is to be celebrated in sung form, one can make a choice between various people, it is desirable that those who are known to be more proficient in singing be given preference; this is especially the case in more solemn liturgical celebrations and in those which either require more difficult singing, or are transmitted by radio or television. If, however, a choice of this kind cannot be made, and the priest or minister does not possess a voice suitable for the proper execution of the singing, he can render without singing one or more of the more difficult parts which concern him, reciting [declamando] them in a loud and distinct voice. However, this must not be done merely for the convenience of the priest or minister” (8).
This paragraph has received very scanty attention in commentaries. Here we see that the case of reciting alta voce is not considered the normal situation but is only an option when the priest or the minister is not able to follow the singing parts; it also says that recitation alta voce ought to be “declaimed [declamando]”, not simply read in a loud voice. Declamation requires a controlled recitation and in some cases should also be accompanied by gestures. Thus it is a ritualized recitation, not a simple reading. But we must remember, this is considered a remote possibility (“this must not be done merely for the convenience of the priest or minister”) compared to the priest or minister singing the parts appropriate to him. Furthermore, it says it is permitted to declaim the more difficult parts, but not everything that is meant to be sung. Musicam Sacram specifies this conception even more neatly further down (16), where we read:
“One cannot find anything more religious and more joyful in sacred celebrations than a whole congregation expressing its faith and devotion in song. Therefore, the active participation of the whole people, which is shown in singing, is to be carefully promoted as follows: (a) It should first of all include acclamations, responses to the greetings of the priest and ministers and to the prayers of litany form, and also antiphons and psalms, refrains or repeated responses, hymns and canticles. (b) Through suitable instruction and practices, the people should be gradually led to a fuller—indeed, to a complete—participation in those parts of the singing which pertain to them. (c) Some of the people's song, however, especially if the faithful have not yet been sufficiently instructed, or if musical settings for several voices are used, can be handed over to the choir alone, provided that the people are not excluded from those parts that concern them. But the usage of entrusting to the choir alone the entire singing of the whole Proper and of the whole Ordinary, to the complete exclusion of the people's participation in the singing, is to be deprecated.”
We need to understand as a priority point “(a)”, which refers to the dialogues of the priest with the assembly. How should the contributions of the sacred minister be performed? Here we should again consult Musicam Sacram. At number 28 it introduces the following criterion for discerning the use of music in the liturgical celebration: “The distinction between solemn, sung and read Mass, sanctioned by the Instruction of 1958 (n. 3), is retained, according to the traditional liturgical laws at present in force. However, for the sung Mass (Missa cantata), different degrees of participation are put forward here for reasons of pastoral usefulness, so that it may become easier to make the celebration of Mass more beautiful by singing, according to the capabilities of each congregation. These degrees are so arranged that the first may be used even by itself, but the second and third, wholly or partially, may never be used without the first. In this way the faithful will be continually led towards an ever greater participation in the singing.”
Now, in light of this tripartite division of the grades of participation in the sung Mass, it interests us to know what especially the first one comprehends, since it is the most basic one and can be used even by itself: “The following belong to the first degree: (a) In the entrance rites: the greeting of the priest together with the reply of the people; the prayer. (b) In the Liturgy of the Word: the acclamations at the Gospel. (c) In the Eucharistic Liturgy: the prayer over the offerings; the preface with its dialogue and the Sanctus; the final doxology of the Canon, the Lord's prayer with its introduction and embolism; the Pax Domini; the prayer after the Communion; the formulas of dismissal” (29). Now, it is enough simply to realize that here also it is speaking about the singing proper to the priest.
Once all of this has been said to systematize and clarify the legislative aspect, it remains to ask ourselves why priests still do not sing, or rather explicitly refuse to sing. In fact, it is quite remarkable that those priests who loath polyphonic music because it “excludes the assembly from participating” (demonstrating that they have an “activistic” conception of participation, different from active participation) are the first ones to say that they “are unable to sing”. This would be a mystery for anyone who does not realize that we are dealing with a tragedy, a tragedy of formation (not only liturgical) of priests in recent decades, who have imbibed false hermeneutics of the Council and are imbued deeply with sentimental “liturgical” songs that have ruled the house in the long season after the Council.
There’s no need to trouble ourselves here with neuroscience—a discipline that would be able to teach us about mirror neurons, the kind activated when others perform the same action. We do not need to know this to realize that we can’t pretend others will sing when the principal actor of song stands there silent and mute on the altar and fixes his eyes on them impassively. And the priest does not sing because he was not trained to sing, as we’ve already said, because he is the son of a liturgical and musical formation of the post-Conciliar period that has thrown away centuries of ecclesial practice per niente (no+ens), for an empty sentimentalism (which is not true sentiment) that has taken over our celebrations, suffocating them in its fatal embrace. There are priests who sing, but these are a minority compared to the vast majority.
I realize that many priests will be thinking of Pope Francis at this point, who as we all know does not sing. But we should not make the mistake of thinking that this is any license for other priests to do the same. This is a situation unique to him and which is definitely not found in his immediate predecessors, such as John Paul II or Benedict XVI. Paul VI himself, who probably was a poor singer, sometimes chanted recto tono. It made me very sad to see the ceremony of the opening of the Jubilee when Pope Francis recited the Psalm verses for the opening of the porta santa and the choir of the Sistine Chapel responded in song (it made very little sense to me.) But for Pope Francis there may be reasons of health that do not permit him to sing: “Very soon after his election the new pope showed he would not sing, but probably not by choice; rather, due to a surgical operation he had on his lungs as a young man. It is possible that this has caused a certain coldness toward music (including liturgical, sacred and classical), as we’ve seen in these first three months and a half of the pontificate. (...)
It is well known that Pope Francis has chosen to prefer the urgency of action over contemplation, just as he prefers the ‘existential peripheries’ to the more or less comfortable sacristies, and daily concreteness to cultural cliques: the first objective is to re-evangelize the people—without resorting to the traditional means available—with words and simple, essential actions, making sure to give hope to the one who suffers, since he is a part of the ‘suffering flesh’ of Christ. But it is also true that sacred music, liturgical music and to some extent classical music was and still is a privileged instrument of evangelization. Music can bring us close to God: ‘He who sings prays twice,’ said St. Augustine. And what sense does it make in any way to humiliate choirs and orchestras (even involuntarily) by ignoring their presence (as on Monday 17th June)?
His words to his collaborators might also cause perplexity, distinguishing ‘work’ from listening to music (considered, it seems, a waste of time). This is all quite enough to discourage people in the Church who have dedicated and continue to dedicate great and (according to us) much needed attention to sacred, liturgical, and classical music—in line with the previous pontificates. In sum, we should not wish that, in his peculiar desire to highlight what is essential in the Church and abandon the superfluous (for example certain tenacious accretions cemented by so many years of history), Pope Francis should reduce to the same category of ‘superfluous’ that which for its part is a fundamental part of evangelization, such as the music we have been speaking about. For walking together toward God cannot prescind from the emotions that impart beauty. True beauty” (note 2).
I wanted to include such a large passage of Rusconi’s excellent article because it points out something of interest not only regarding Pope Francis but the clerical world in general: we need to recover that fundamental part of evangelization which is true liturgical music. And true liturgical music is not whatever piece happens to be written by priests, considered liturgical just because it has a liturgical text or because a priest has written it. The way is becoming more and more difficult and there is no evidence on the horizon of a serious reform of seminaries that takes these concerns into account. And our liturgies continue to be infested with songs that do not befit their dignity, sacrality, and grandeur.
- Aurelio Porfiri is an Italian composer, conductor, writer and educator whose music is published in Italy, France, Germany, the USA and China. He has published 23 books, including “I would like to meet a saint: A Spiritual Diary.” Together with Prof. Peter Kwasniewski he promoted the Declaration on Sacred Music on March 5, 2017. He is the chief editor of ALTARE DEI, a magazine on liturgy, sacred music and Catholic culture.
note 1: Porfiri, A. (2016). Partecipazione al canto nella messa. Taken on March 20, 2016 from Paix liturgique: http://it.paix‐liturgique.org/aff_lettre.asp?LET_N_ID=2416
note 2: Rusconi, G. (2013, June 22). Papa Francesco e la musica: un rapporto problematico. Taken on March 28, 2016 from http://www.rossoporpora.org/rubriche/papa‐francesco/254‐papa‐francesco‐e‐la‐musica‐un‐rapporto‐problematico.html
Sunday, May 07, 2017
Remembering Cardinal Domenico Bartolucci: Guest Article by Aurelio Porfiri
Gregory DiPippoWe are extremely grateful to Maestro Aurelio Porfiri for sharing with NLM this beautiful tribute to Domenico Cardinal Bartolucci, one of the leading lights of sacred music in the 20th century, on the centenary of his birth.
Today I would like to recall the one-hundredth year since the birth of the maestro and cardinal Domenico Bartolucci, significant to me not only because he was my teacher, but because I think he was an absolute genius, the greatest composer in the field of sacred music in the 20th century. Sooner or later, I believe this fact will be realized by specialists in musicology. I am writing a book about him using some unpublished material I have been fortunate to discover in various archives.
His Eminence Domenico Card. Bartolucci conducts the singing of the Creed during a Solemn Pontifical Mass in the Extraordinary Form celebrated in St Peter’s Basilica by H.E. Walter Card. Brandmüller on May 15, 2011. Photo courtesy of Orbis Catholicus Secundus.
|
From the days of his youth, Domenico demonstrated a double vocation to music and to priesthood. As a baby he was immersed in the musical world of the Catholic Church, as he recalled in one place:
“When I was a boy I remember that the people used to sing in church. They sang at Vespers (all from memory: the antiphons, psalms and hymns); they sang at devotional functions (Way of the Cross, Marian devotions, etc.); they sang in processions (the Magnificat, Te Deum, Lauda Sion, and other hymns); they sang even at Solemn Mass sometimes. (When I was a boy, each Sunday at my little church there was a Solemn Mass, and on normal Sundays the people sang by themselves.) I used to sing too, either behind the altar with my father, who was the parish cantor, or with the people in the pews whenever there weren’t cantors behind the altar. The people sang: they sang in a loud voice, a song that centuries and centuries had handed down to them, a lusty song, severe and strong, that the children had learned from their elders, not at school desks or examination rooms but by constant habit, in the continuous practice of the Church. How can I recall without a still-living emotion the participation of all of people at the Liturgy of the Dead, and especially in the Obsequies? Everyone, I mean everyone, belted out the Libera me Domine and then the In Paradisum and then the De Profundis...! Everyone! And the music, that gorgeous music, attained an unmatchable power; the last, deep, hearty farewell to the dead as he left the church where countless times he had sung full-throatedly the praises of God! The people sang!”
After elementary school, in which he was permitted to skip several years because of the superior preparation he received at home, he entered the seminary of Florence, where he also dedicated himself to music, singing in the seminary’s boys’ choir. There he began his studies with the maestro of the seminary choir, Francesco Bagnoli. Studying the pianoforte in the seminary was not a simple matter: the young student even resorted to making a keyboard out of cardboard on which he could practice. At twelve years old, he composed a Mass and an Ave Verum for two voices. At sixteen he composed another Mass in a more mature style, and with very original musical themes. This Mass, originally for four mixed voices, would be reworked a few years later, expanded to five mixed voices and enriched by an orchestra. It became one of the most imposing of Domenico Bartolucci’s compositions, the Missa Assumptionis. At seventeen he produced one of his most beautiful and dramatic motets, the Super Flumina Babylonis for six mixed voices. He went on to be named organist and then director of the choir of the Duomo at Florence. Many professors of the Florence conservatory of music went to Mass on Sunday at eleven o’clock to hear the young musician improvise on the organ.
Before finishing his twentieth year, he began composing his most significant symphonic choral works: the Symphony Rustica and the oratorio La Tempesta sul Lago. In 1939, at the age of 22, he received his diploma in composition and orchestral direction with Vito Frazzi at the Florence conservatory. This diploma, too, demonstrated the uncommon gifts of the young maestro. In only two sessions, between July and October, he completed all the principal and complementary subjects to merit the diploma. The normal plan of study foresaw the completion of these subjects in a course of ten years. That same year, he was ordained a priest.
At the end of 1942, he was sent to Rome to perfect his craft and master the tradition of sacred music. There he became Vice-Maestro of the chapel of the Basilica of St John Lateran, the cathedral of Rome, but the Second World War would necessitate his return to his native village. In this difficult period were born other important works in the genre of choral symphony, such as the oratorio La Passione (1942) and the concerto for pianoforte and orchestra. Right after the war, he returned to Rome and obtained a diploma in specialized composition and choral direction at the Accademia di Santa Cecilia, under the guidance of Ildebrando Pizzetti. He also obtained the diploma in sacred composition at Rome’s Pontifical Institute of Sacred Music. In 1947 he became parish priest in a tiny village near Florence, but continued to dedicate himself to composition. The composition of the sacred poem Baptisma, for soloists, female choir and orchestra, dates to this period. In the same year he was recalled to Rome and appointed maestro of the Basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore and professor of composition, polyphonic direction and polyphonic music at the Pontifical Institute of Sacred Music, a position he kept until 1997. In 1952 he was named Vice Maestro of the Sistine Pontifical Chapel, in order to assist the principal director, Lorenzo Perosi, who had already been ill for some time.
| Maestro Bartolucci with the Schola Puerorum, processing through the cloister of St John in the Lateran early 1960s. (Photo from the website of the Fondazione Domenico Bartolucci) |
In 1965, Bartolucci was named a member of the Academy of Santa Cecilia, where he found himself in the company of the most important international figures in music. Besides regular liturgical services in the Sistine Chapel, the maestro held numerous concerts in Italy and elsewhere. The Sistine Chapel would also conduct two successful coast-to-coast tours of the United States in the ’70s.
After his retirement in 1997, the maestro continued a fervid activity as director and composer. In 2010 Benedict XVI, his great admirer, created him Cardinal Deacon of the Most Holy Name of Jesus and Maria in Via Lata. Cardinal Domenico Bartolucci died on November 11th, 2013.
Cardinal Bartolucci arriving to celebrate Mass at the Fraternity of St Peter’s Roman parish, Santissima Trinità dei Pellegrini, on the feast of the Immaculate Conception in 2010.
|
Sacred music at the Chapel was certainly his most outstanding accomplishment, due to his decades of activity as director in the most prestigious Roman cappelle musicali. In his first book of motets, which comprises his Marian antiphons, we find already in evidence all the elements that characterize him as a composer and form the foundation of his poetic work: modal language, masterful handling of the choir, almost constant use of Gregorian themes, the lyricism of every polyphonic part, rejection of extreme dissonance, careful adherence to texts as they are found in the rite, the exaltation of the text in its most profound spiritual meaning, and the abhorrence of forced sentimental effects, which led to truer and more spiritual significance in his music. It would be difficult to comment here on the great many musical gems that fill his books, the fruit of the daily exercise of disciplined knowledge gain over the course of through decades, and which placed itself on the shoulders of the giants who proceeded him.
There are a few important characteristics of his production and activity:
1) A Roman Musician of the Church
Without hesitation we must say that he was a profoundly Christian musician, and one profoundly involved in the liturgical life of the Roman Catholic Church: “Venerable Maestro, you have always labored to strengthen sacred music and make it a vehicle of evangelization. Through the innumerable concerts it performed in Italy and abroad with the universal language of art, the Pontifical Chapel has, under your guidance, cooperated with the mission of the Popes, which is to spread the Christian message to the world” (Benedict XVI, 2006).
2) The Sacred Text
In order to fully understand his music, and for that matter all of Gregorian chant and polyphony, one has to realize the absolute importance that the text has in such music. It is not only something that is set to music, but becomes in a certain sense the very form of the composition. In modern music there are various musical elements that determine the criteria for the use of texts. In the liturgical music we are speaking about, the text is the master of the composition, deciding its points of expansion and rest, establishing the priorities. The text, together with the liturgical context, gives the form, accents, and meter of the composition.
3) Modality
The harmonic language Bartolucci chose ran entirely contrary to the artistic tendencies of the period. He chose to express himself in modal language, which is the language that uses the traditional ecclesiastical scales on which Gregorian chant, and thus renaissance polyphony, is based.
4) Lyricism Bartolucci’s harmonic language does not seek extreme dissonance. Above all it seeks intensity of spiritual emotion through the power of song. This is partly due to the nature of Italian lyricism, which tends to emphasize the expression of the singer as the protagonist, rather than his subordination to the needs of the mass chorus as is more typical in the splendid tradition of the English musical world.
5) Attention to Tradition
The Maestro had a deep reverence for tradition, that complex of usages and practices handed down from the past. But what is Tradition (with a big “T”)? More or less everyone claims the word, but I think few could define it if asked. Tradition is “to hand down”, to transmit. It is a bridge between yesterday and today, a gift the past makes to the future. Tradition is a victory over nothingness, the opposite of the annihilation of things and person in the flow of centuries. His concept of tradition is also tied to his concept of musical training, which is nothing other than that of the great Roman school. Music is learned through experience, by doing. Experience, what we call “practice”, is the most basic element of musical formation. Just as the painters labored in the workshop of a master and learned his secrets by working with him side by side, so musicians learned the secrets of the maestros’ arts in the choir loft, not with purely theoretical notions, but acquiring the art in the very act of doing.
It is precisely this fecundity of Tradition that gives more radiant life to the future.
The long and fertile artistic life of our author deserves to be more deeply studied and appreciated in the light of the historical and cultural context he lived through. Choirs can greatly benefit from singing his pieces, with have such masterful choral writing; every composer can learn fascinating secrets of polyphonic composition; every director has, in Bartolucci’s music, a certain and efficacious means to encourage in their faithful an intense meditation on the spiritual life.
- Aurelio Porfiri is an Italian composer, conductor, writer and educator whose music is published in Italy, France, Germany, the USA and China. He has published 23 books, including “I would like to meet a saint: A Spiritual Diary.” Together with Prof. Peter Kwasniewski he promoted the Declaration on Sacred Music on March 5, 2017. He is the chief editor of ALTARE DEI, a magazine on liturgy, sacred music and Catholic culture.
Wednesday, March 08, 2017
Third Issue of “Altare Dei” with Special Features for the 50th Anniversary of Musicam Sacram
Peter KwasniewskiAurelio Porfiri
TOP STORY
Revisiting Musicam Sacram
David M. Friel
LITURGICAL THEOLOGY
Liturgy and Assembly
David W. Fagerberg
Priesthood and Liturgy in Rahner
Giovanni Cavalcoli
LITURGY
The Lectionary of the Extraordinary Form
Joseph Shaw
MUSICAL INSERT
ALMA REDEMPTORIS (Acclamation for the Rosary, SATB and Organ) Alberico Vitalini
LAUS TIBI DOMINE (SATB and Organ) Colin Mawby
COR, ARCA LEGEM CONTINENS (TTB AND ORGAN) Valentino Miserachs
AVE MARIA (Unison and Organ) Aurelio Porfiri
ADORO TE DEVOTE (SATB) Mauro Visconti
CATECHISM ON THE MASS
Part 3
Enrico Zoffoli
SACRED MUSIC
Ulisse Matthey Seventy Years After His Death
Fausto Caporali
Sacred Music as Occasion of Grace for Modern Man
Peter A. Kwasniewski
An Essential Guide to Church Music Job Offerings for Dummies
Aurelio Porfiri
The Gradual of the Passion
Fulvio Rampi
CATHOLIC CULTURE
Money money money: an Interview with Ettore Gotti Tedeschi
Aurelio Porfiri
SACRED ART
The True Purpose of Christian Art
Rodolfo Papa
BOOK REVIEWS
Belinda e il Mostro (Aurelio Porfiri)
Le cronache di Babele (Aurelio Porfiri)
Tempio, Icona e Musica Sacra (Aurelio Porfiri)
The issue may be purchased here for 6 Euros.
Wednesday, February 01, 2017
Second Issue of “ALTARE DEI” Now Available
Peter KwasniewskiThe Table of Contents follows.
ALTARE DEI N. 2 – JANUARY 2017
€6.00
EDITORIAL
Aurelio Porfiri
TOP STORY
In defense of the Organ Postlude
Peter A. Kwasniewski
LITURGICAL THEOLOGY
What is the Mystery of the Liturgy
David W. Fagerberg
LITURGY
Toward Holier Communions: A simple suggestion
Thomas M. Kocik
On Celebration Ad Orientem
Joseph Shaw
WITNESSES
Jean Nicolas Grou
MUSICAL INSERT
AVE MARIA (Solo, SATB and Organ) Mauro Visconti
MAGNIFICAT (SATB and Organ) Colin Mawby
EASTER ALLELUIA (SATB) Aurelio Porfiri
QUEM TERRA, PONTUS, SIDERA (2 Equal voices and Organ) Valentino Miserachs
INTERLUDE (Organ) Aurelio Porfiri
SALVASTI NOS, DOMINE (2 Equal voices and Organ)Aurelio Porfiri
EXULTATE IUSTI (Acclamation for the Rosary, SATB and Organ) Alberico Vitalini
CATECHISM
On the Mass, Part 2
Enrico Zoffoli
PROFILES
Priestly dignity according to Blessed Antonio Rosmini
Enrico Finotti
SACRED MUSIC
The earliest Catholic Choir school
David M. Friel
Sacred Music from St. Pius X to our days
Valentino Miserachs
Gregorian Chant for the First Sunday of Lent: The Sunday of Temptation
Fulvio Rampi
CATHOLIC CULTURE
A Church on her knees (and not in a good sense)…
Aurelio Porfiri
“Only a blind man can deny that there’s now in the Church great confusion…”
Interview with Cardinal Carlo Caffarra (From Il Foglio)
EVENTS
“Miracle” in Trieste: Bach’s celebrated monumental B minor Mass after at least 50 years
Alberto Carosa
Order here.
Friday, October 28, 2016
Inaugural Issue of ALTARE DEI: A Magazine on Liturgy and Sacred Music
Peter Kwasniewski"Altare Dei will present in English featured articles not only by people in the Anglo-Saxon world, but also by European theologians and liturgists whose work will be translated. We hope in this way to promote a wider awareness of the good work that is taking place in different countries and language spheres. Each issue will also feature an insert of sacred music scores. The inaugural issue contains 6 original pieces (12 pages of music) from fine contemporary Church composers.
"The cost of the issue is 6 Euros (ca. $7 US). You can download the PDF right away, no shipping fees."
Here is the table of contents of the first issue:
EDITORIAL
Aurelio Porfiri
TOP STORY
"Challenging the great liturgical narrative"
Aurelio Porfiri
LITURGICAL THEOLOGY
"Proclaiming the Kingdom of God through Preaching and Sacraments"
David W. Fagerberg
LITURGY
"Applause in Church"
Serafino Tognetti
"Vatican II and the Reform of the Mass"
Peter A. Kwasniewski
"The Role of Psalmody in Catholic Worship"
David M. Friel
INTERVIEW
Three questions for Archbishop Agostino Marchetto
WITNESSES
Benedict XVI
MUSICAL INSERT
Alleluia, Ego Sum Pastor Bonus (SATB and Organ) by Mauro Visconti
Song of Ruth (SATB and Organ) by Colin Mawby
Iustorum Animae (3 Equal voices) by Aurelio Porfiri
Puer Natus (3 Equal voices and Organ) by Valentino Miserachs
Amen (SATB and Organ) by Aurelio Porfiri
O Salutaris Hostia (ATB) by Aurelio Porfiri
CATECHISM ON THE MASS/1
Enrico Zoffoli
PROFILES
"Cornelio Fabro, Christ’s Priest"
Rosa Goglia
SACRED MUSIC
"My life at 80"
Colin Mawby
"Remembering Armando Renzi"
Valentino Miserachs
SACRED ART
"Catholic Painting as 'Living Writing'"
Rodolfo Papa
For more information, see here.
Wednesday, March 09, 2016
Excellent Article on Sacred Music by Aurelio Porfiri
Peter KwasniewskiThere have been few topics which have so captured the attention of liturgical experts like that of participation. This term has been impugned by one after another faction as if each one possessed its secret meaning, discovered by and revealed to only a chosen few, who thus turned even legitimate debates on the issue into Gnostic liturgists’ meetings. Gnostic because, especially after the Council, participation has become a battle issue in which lurks every sort of political, sociological, and psychological element.
For some, “participate” means that everyone does everything. However, this interpretation goes against the true meaning of participation which lies not in the mode of doing but in that of being. This mode does not exclude doing, but rather contains it in a broader, more articulated process. Doing presupposes being and all that goes along with it, but it is not an end in itself. ...
Unfortunately, while the abovementioned error was made by some of the reformers after the Council, some of those who felt attached to what later would be called the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite have often had an equally inappropriate reaction, on the opposite extreme. For them it was a sign of fidelity to “tradition” to simply and passively attend Mass without worrying about singing in this or that part of the celebration, but only enjoying what the choir or organist was able to offer. Now, it seems that both these attitudes hide a basic impropriety, and that recovering a more authentic sense of participation will also clarify important facts about the Mass itself, which otherwise risk being pushed to the background, picked apart by “liturgical wars” that, in the end, lead to no victory.
To participate, as the word itself says (pars + capere), means "to take part". Now, several important consequences come from the way in which we read this word. Unfortunately, in recent times much emphasis has been placed on “the one who takes part,” rather than “take part in what.” This slipping of the subject has also caused a slipping in value, as if the guests invited to a birthday celebration were more important than the one being celebrated. Actually, as we all know, the one being celebrated is certainly more important, and all the efforts of the guests at the “celebration” (another term widely used and abused in recent decades) are directed to the one celebrated. Otherwise, one runs the risk of what the Servite liturgist Silvano Maggiani calls “participationism”—the insistence on making everyone do everything—with the consequent loss of the center of the actio liturgica, which is not “the one who participates,” but rather that in which one participates. In the liturgy, it is not we who act, but we who are acted upon. ...
Having said this, and using good common sense, in line with what the popes have asked, we must agree that even exterior participation must be cultivated. Regarding the exterior act, this means answering the priest, but also participating in certain parts of the singing. This requirement is not simply a result of the liturgical reform following Vatican II, but was also solemnly requested by the pre-Conciliar popes. The call to actively drink from the fount of the liturgy came already from St. Pius X, who affirmed the following in his Motu Proprio on sacred music on November 22, 1903: “Filled as We are with a most ardent desire to see the true Christian spirit flourish in every respect and be preserved by all the faithful, We deem it necessary to provide before anything else for the sanctity and dignity of the temple, in which the faithful assemble for no other object than that of acquiring this spirit from its foremost and indispensable font, which is the active participation in the most holy mysteries and in the public and solemn prayer of the Church”.
Posted Wednesday, March 09, 2016
Labels: active participation, Aurelio Porfiri, Sacred Music, St Pius X







